As you started there, Jörn: http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui-dev/browse_thread/thread/9a43ebc6ae185cfa?hl=en
To my point of view, a much nicer place for cookie management to be! ;-) Regards, Diogo On Aug 23, 2:27 pm, Jörn Zaefferer <[email protected]> wrote: > jQuery UI could be a better place for a cookie component, to live > along other utilities like Positon and Stackfix. Once it makes it into > a stable release, you could use the jQuery UI download builder to > configure your setup. > > Jörn > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:34 PM, diogobaeder<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Agreed. Dependency management can solve the problem of identifying the > > correct API to use with plugins. > > > But, as for cookie management on the core, I still don't agree. It > > will make the jQuery object grow in size, thus affecting performance, > > and this functionality has nothing to do with anything else that > > jQuery already has in its core - cookies management don't need DOM > > manipulation or Ajax to work -. > > > My vote is still to have cookies outside of the core lib. > > > Regards, > > > Diogo > > > On Aug 22, 4:36 pm, ludovic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This could be managed by a jquery-side dependencies management of > >> "labelized" plugins. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
