Sure, I was just explaining another alternative :-) On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Kean <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @Webreflection > > Relax, I was just addressing the originator of the post. > > On Sep 14, 3:11 pm, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Kean I do not get with who you are talking, is it me? I perfectly know > kangx > > post, I knew before (old codes in devpro) , and I use a strategy not even > > mentioned in kangax post where the last fallback is always the IE one to > > avoid redundancy and any kind of problem ... e.g. > > > > var slice = (function($slice){ > > try { > > $slice.call(document.childNodes); > > function slice(list){ > > return $slice.call(list); > > };} catch(e) { > > > > function slice(){ > > for(var r = [], i = 0, length = list.length; i < length; ++i) > > r[i] = list[i] > > ; > > return r; > > }; > > > > }; > > return slice; > > })(Array.prototype.slice); > > > > I said about functions just because it is not only about var, being this > is > > the oddity post ... got it? :-) > > > > Regards > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Kean <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well, if you didn't get it ... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
