It's very possible as the company continues to expand :P. Now that you mention it, though, I could probably break them out into a department and then manager menu/submenu which would filter the list out quite nicely.
Though, of all the things I've used jQuery for, this being the only issue really says a lot about it. Optimizing the menu like that might even eliminate, or at least greatly reduce, this issue. Thanks for the ideas and help. I probably would have continued to over think the situation and may have taken even longer to come up with the idea to break the menu into department/manager groups, haha. Over thinking is sometimes worse than inexperience, I think. On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:23 AM, DBJDBJ <dbj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have created quick and dirty test of adding 50K options to the > single elements. > Then I started it on this desktop and IE8 ... and .... waited > Then I did not believed what I have seen, and executed the same test > on the WIN7 64 bit + IE8 64bit ( 2 core Intel + 2GB RAM). > The result was almost exactly the same (as on single core , 1GB > laptop ) > > "...Tests completed in 1168643 milliseconds..." > > To append 50.000 options to a select element ?! > The latest Chrome Beta on the same W7 machine, jQ unit test reports 1 > millisecond (which can't be right) > Same is on the latest FF ...although FF "complaints" message box > popped-up. > > Maybe not an "real life example" ... but ... I hope Matt wil not have > 50K+ users ;o) > > --DBJ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
