Absolutely - probably one ticket for each and just link back to this thread.
--John On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jörn Zaefferer <joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > That sounds great. I think in case of my Tooltip plugin there is an > additional problem, where a mouseover event doesn't happen when the mouse is > over a tooltip element that still fades out. I may be able to fix that with > mousemove. > > So, if we can get these three fixed and that other issue, the jQuery UI > Tooltip would be mostly done. > > Should I create a ticket for these? > > Jörn > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:06 PM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So it seems like a couple things would fix your problems: >> 1) If fadeIn or fadeOut is called while a partial opacity is shown >> then animate to the final state, starting from the current opacity >> (right now fadeIn, in particular, won't run). >> 2) Make the actual time to run the animation be equal to >> currentOpacityDiff * timeToRunAnimation (where currentOpacityDiff is a >> number 0 to 1). >> 3) Make fadeTo show an element if it's not visible. >> >> The only remaining issue is to figure out how the queueing should >> work. It seems like you would just still need to call .stop() before >> running any animation. >> >> --John >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Jörn Zaefferer >> <joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've built a testpage to document this issues with fadeIn/Out: >> > http://jquery-ui.googlecode.com/svn/branches/labs/fadequeue/index.html >> > >> > As written on that page, the issues are: >> > >> > Without using stop(), animations just queue up, thats inacceptable >> > With just using stop(), styles end up in the middle, screwing up the >> > next >> > fade, that is, stopping a fadeout half way through will cause the next >> > fade >> > in to not fade to 1 >> > Using stop(false, true) will finish the animations, which worksaround >> > the >> > above problems, but the result is ugly, as a stopped fadeout will skip >> > to >> > the end, then fade in again from 0, instead of just fading in from the >> > current opacity >> > The crazy complicated stuff, using a mix of fadeIn/Out and fadeTo, apart >> > from being way too complicated, has the big drawback that the >> > fadeTo-animations take exactly as long as the others, while it usually >> > doesn't fade from 0 to 1, but only from, say, 0.7 to 1. Adding a >> > calculation >> > to figure out how long the animation should be relative to the current >> > opacity would make this just more complicated. >> > fadeIn/Out can use opacity values defined in CSS stylesheets, while >> > fadeTo >> > requires the user to specify the opacity >> > >> > My goal for now is to create a plugin, with your help, that can be used >> > instead of fadeIn/Out. It would not queue up animations, it would read >> > opacity from stylesheets, just like fadeIn/Out do, and it would adjust >> > the >> > animation duration relative to the current opacity if a fade is >> > stopped/reversed, so that if a fade in is stopped half-way through by a >> > fadeout, the fadeout would only take half the specified duration, >> > resulting >> > in the same animation speed all the time. >> > >> > Based on how the plugin ends up, I hope we can port back something to >> > jQuery >> > Core to make that available just as easily as fadeIn/Out. >> > >> > Looking forward to your ideas. >> > >> > Jörn >> > >> > -- >> > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "jQuery Development" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jQuery Development" group. >> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jQuery Development" group. > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
