Just regarding the issue of jsonp, I'll ponit you to my own jsonp plugin:
http://code.google.com/p/jquery-jsonp/
I too agree jsonp is a bit too specific for an inclusion within $.ajax but
the proposed solution of returning a wrapper around the xhr could help
smoothing out differences.

Regarding the race condition, well, it all depends how this error() method
is implemented really. I was more concerned about the bind() approach John
was proposing.

2009/11/10 Dave Methvin <dave.meth...@gmail.com>

> > Couldn't you just use the .ajaxError() method in conjunction with
> > $.get or $.post? That seems to work for me.
>
> I use that technique as well, and it's nice because it gets the error
> checking out of the way of the main code. I also have used a wrapper
> plugin around $.ajax in some cases. Neither is burdensome.
>
> $.ajax is already one of the most complex and least consistent methods
> in jQuery, so if anything I'd like to see it get simpler. For example,
> the method now handles jsonp requests (based on either dataType or the
> domain in the url) but many of the completion methods expect a xhr
> object which jsonp requests don't have.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=.


Reply via email to