The most frequent case I've seen is $().ready() (which still works and
I plan on continuing to make work, at least for the time being). I
haven't really seen other cases being used in the wild - do you have
any examples?

--John



On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:06 PM, ajpiano <ajpi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A recent commit - 
> http://github.com/jquery/jquery/commit/04524287d3e0112deae570ff9247c734833431bb
> - changed the behaviour of $() from $(document) to $([]).
>
> This is a change that I can truly jibe with, and I think the behaviour
> makes sense. No one likes having to do $([]) to create an empty jQuery
> object.  Unfortunately, no change for 1.4 has made me think "will
> break a lot of people's code" like this one.  For some inane reason,
> people (and a lot of tutorials) really started using the $() shortcut,
> so the change kind of makes me somewhat uneasy.
>
> Would love to hear any other perspectives on this. Should the change
> stay in and be loudly shouted as a potential 1.4 transition issue, or
> rolled back?
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.


Reply via email to