What if we changed the JSON part of the httpData function from:
// Get the JavaScript object, if JSON is used.
if ( type == "json" )
data = window["eval"]("(" + data + ")");
to:
// Get the JavaScript object, if JSON is used.
if ( type == "json" || !type && ct && ct.indexOf("json") >= 0)
data = window["eval"]("(" + data + ")");
It's been quite helpful to me indeed, i.e., in implementing a
classical "client submits form" ---> "server processes form" --->
"server returns content (form errors) or redirect (no errors)"
approach within tabs, greatly speeding development time:
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/mformprocessor",
data: $("#mform").serialize(),
success: function(resp){
if (!empty(resp.redir) {
redirTab(resp.redir, TABS_CONTAINER_ID, 2);
} else {
setTabHTML(resp, TABS_CONTAINER_ID, 2);
}
}
});
This affords the server the ability to effect varying actions on the
client without worrying about output buffering (resp.html) and other
headache inducers. Plus, I think it's a good idea to treat the
response as json if the content-type header is json.
Might something like this be committable?
On Dec 22, 1:19 pm, webbiedave <webbied...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Could we change the $.ajax() function to treat the server's response
> as json if dataType is unspecified and the response content-type is
> "application/json"?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
