Maybe I should start writing a dependency loading system... LOL On Dec 22, 9:42 am, aHeckman <aaron.heckm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Julian, dominoes is very nice. I like your flexible syntax for > ordering dependencies and how you allow your configuration of named > resources. > > I too just finished a loader for jQuery but it has different goals in > mind. Namely, I wanted a loader that would do more than just > javascript. Many jQuery plugins and jQuery-ui components have css > stylesheet and image dependencies as well so I felt a good loader > should handle these too. It's still early but so far it's been useful. > You can check it out here:http://github.com/aheckmann/jQuery.use > > My vision is that we come together as a community and organize all of > the jQuery components / plugins under one umbrella, and be able to > dynamically serve all of them from a managed repo / CDN - > thinkhttp://yui.yahooapis.com/combo?for the entire jQuery community. > jQuery.use is configurable to use a file concat service like YUIs > combo service. > > jQuery.use('jquery-ui-tabs', function ($) { > $('.tabs').tabs(); > > }); > > On Dec 21, 9:23 pm, Julian Aubourg <aubourg.jul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > OK, so I finally got time to write some docs & unit tests for my own baby... > > and here comes Dominoes:http://code.google.com/p/javascript-dominoes/ > > > See the Wiki pages to get an idea of what it is capable of (quite the wall > > of text there but heh). > > > It is more of a general purpose "scheduler" and provides some nice features > > like property expansion, global dependency rules, etc, etc. It is browser > > agnostic in the spirit of sizzle. > > > Only 4kB minified but the google compiler breaks the code (I didn't have > > time to investigate why). > > > 2009/12/21 John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> > > > > Hi James - > > > > There's definitely room for collaboration here. As I mentioned in the > > > comments on the commit I'm planning on holding off on jQuery.require() > > > until post-1.4 so that we can really get it right and hopefully > > > standardize a bit. I'll ping you again after the 1.4 dust has settled > > > and we can discuss it some more. > > > > --John > > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:16 PM, James Burke <jrbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I heard about the jQuery require that is shown as part of this > > > > changeset: > > > >http://github.com/jquery/jquery/commit/998cb005fc378188b3bae319e391d1... > > > > > I work on Dojo's module loader, and have a new standalone (no other > > > > library dependency) script loader here: > > > >http://code.google.com/p/runjs/wiki/RunJs > > > > > The goal is to keep RunJS compatible with the goals of CommonJS > > > > (avoiding globals mainly) but still allow for a module syntax that > > > > works well natively in the browser. It does not use XHR calls, just > > > > script tags. Works before page load and after page load. > > > > > It also handles loading regular scripts that are not coded as modules: > > > > > run(["some/script.js", "another/script.js"], function() { > > > > //This callback is fired when both scripts load > > > > }); > > > > > For scripts that do follow the module syntax and have dependencies, it > > > > properly traces the module dependencies and calls the module > > > > definition functions in the correct order. > > > > > It would be ideal if more of the JS libraries started to standardize > > > > on a script loader. I am happy to work out changes to RunJS if jQuery > > > > might find it useful to use. For instance, the entry point does not > > > > have to be called run(), I am considering switching to script() since > > > > it handles general script loading and callbacks when scripts are > > > > loaded. > > > > > It also might be good to pull out a script loader from the core jQuery > > > > library, if only to keep the separation of concerns easier to track. > > > > RunJS has plugins for i18n string bundle loading, and also can load > > > > text files (like HTML snippets) via async xhr, then inline those text > > > > files as part of a build process. > > > > > But I may be misunderstanding the scope of jQuery's require. In any > > > > case, I just wanted to see if there was some common interest and if we > > > > might be able to coordinate our efforts. > > > > > Thanks for your time, > > > > James Burke > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > "jQuery Development" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou > > > ps.com> > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "jQuery Development" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<jquery-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou > > > ps.com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
