Thanks. I do realize that in the vast majority of cases unfiltered is
fine, but as a convenience method it'd be nice to be able to filter.

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:55 PM, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It was intentional in that in the places where we use it we weren't
> concerned with properties bleeding through from prototypes. I will
> make a note of it in the documentation and we can re-examine this
> after 1.4 is out.
>
> http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.isEmptyObject/
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Sidney San Martín <s...@sidneysm.com> wrote:
>> I notice that jQuery.isEmptyObject() in 1.4rc1 uses an unfiltered
>> for...in, so it'll pick up on inherited properties. Is this
>> intentional? Is so, maybe it should be documented or there should be a
>> flag on isEmptyObject() to only look at the object's own properties.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "jQuery Development" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "jQuery Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en.


Reply via email to