For the record, recent version of the jQuery corner plugin do not have
a problem with $ usage.
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/corner/jquery.corner.js?format=txt
Mike
Think perhaps that jQuery rounded corners in one of those that needs to
be re-done, 'cos
no matter what order I call the libraries, whether I use
jQuery.noConflict() or not, it just
will not round the box corners.
The sole reason of trying to use prototype is cos of PeriodicalUpdater
which makes it easy
for me to loop a function. I say easy cos I'm not a coder. So if anyone
can point out a
jQuery-equivalent to PeriodicalUpdater, I'll just stick with jQuery for
all my js needs.
TIA
Mike Alsup wrote:
>
> Kelly,
>
> I assume that "your code" is jQuery based. The easiest approach is to
> simply scope your code like this:
>
> (function($) {
>
> // your code here
>
> })(jQuery);
>
> This lets you write in typical jQuery style (using the $ symbol)
> without worrying about collisions with other libraries. Most jQuery
> plugins have been refactored to use this approach. However, as I
> pointed our earlier, some older plugins still assume that $ == jQuery.
> Thickbox is an older plugin that is known to rely on $ but Klaus
> Hartl is currently rewritting it and a new and improved version will
> be available soon(ish).
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 4/23/07, kerford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to piggyback on this thread if I could. I'm writing for an
>> environment that may or may not have other libraries included in the
>> page. It's not something I can know beforehand. I also won't know in
>> what order libraries (if any) are loaded. What is the best, most
>> defensive approach to take for this kind of environment?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kelly
>>
>>
>
