Stosh,
>> Maybe these ideas suck, but here they are:
>>
>> execInterval()
>> execTimer()
>> timer()
>> repeatInterval()
>> execRepeat()
>>
>> Somebody else might be able to come up with a better name.
>
>Dan,
>What about just calling it "execute" and swap the parameters so
>that...
IMO, it should be clear from the method name what a function does. I don't
think "execute" clearly indicates it repeats a function every XX
milliseconds.
The name "execute" I'd expect it to execute the function right away--like a
closure:
(function (){
alert("hello world!");
})();
At least that's what I think the name implies. Maybe the name "repeat" would
suffice.
-Dan
