Ok, now I get it! Thanks guys ;-) On May 31, 6:35 pm, Rhapidophyllum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing--almost forgot. Since photos can of course take a > while to download, it's good to preload them. I'm not sure if this > is correct, but I think Lightbox 2 preloads 1 image, but Thickbox > doesn't preload any. > > On May 31, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Rhapidophyllum wrote: > > > The other difference is that Thickbox resizes images to fit the > > screen + buffer size. While this is good in many situations, it > > often isn't desirable for displaying photos, where you typically > > want users to see the original photo quality. Lightbox 2 has the > > animated size transitions, and displays photos full size. So > > having something like Litebox which could be more suited to photo > > galleries than Thickbox is a good thing to have. > > > On May 31, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote: > > >> On May 31, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Diego A. wrote: > > >>> As far as as can see, the jQuery Thickbox does everything the others > >>> do. I use it here: > >>>http://www.london-dry-cleaners.com/Laundry/ > > >>> What am I missing? > > >> The default thickbox implementation doesn't have animated sizing > >> of the images. They just pop up there with no transition from one > >> to the next. > > >> --Karl > >> _________________ > >> Karl Swedberg > >>www.englishrules.com > >>www.learningjquery.com