Ok, now I get it!
Thanks guys ;-)

On May 31, 6:35 pm, Rhapidophyllum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing--almost forgot.  Since photos can of course take a
> while to download, it's good to preload them.  I'm not sure if this
> is correct, but I think Lightbox 2 preloads 1 image, but Thickbox
> doesn't preload any.
>
> On May 31, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Rhapidophyllum wrote:
>
> > The other difference is that Thickbox resizes images to fit the
> > screen + buffer size.  While this is good in many situations, it
> > often isn't desirable for displaying photos, where you typically
> > want users to see the original photo quality.  Lightbox 2 has the
> > animated size transitions, and displays photos full size.  So
> > having something like Litebox which could be more suited to photo
> > galleries than Thickbox is a good thing to have.
>
> > On May 31, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
>
> >> On May 31, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Diego A. wrote:
>
> >>> As far as as can see, the jQuery Thickbox does everything the others
> >>> do. I use it here:
> >>>http://www.london-dry-cleaners.com/Laundry/
>
> >>> What am I missing?
>
> >> The default thickbox implementation doesn't have animated sizing
> >> of the images. They just pop up there with no transition from one
> >> to the next.
>
> >> --Karl
> >> _________________
> >> Karl Swedberg
> >>www.englishrules.com
> >>www.learningjquery.com

Reply via email to