Thanks for the feedback. Does anyone else have any input on this. I think I'll be pushing a new release this weekend.
Josh On Jun 28, 7:33 pm, Josh Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As my masked input plugin approaches 1.0, I'm noticing that my plugin > isn't following the conventions of the jQuery library itself. > > Currently my plugins main method is .maskedinput(mask,options) > > I'm thinking I should change it to .maskInput(mask,options) or > simpley .mask(mask,options) > > I think this change is good because it's a verb and it shows action. > > Also, there is a global method which allows user defined char > placeholders which Jörn advided me to namespace off. > > So, I plan to put it in $.MaskedInput.addPlaceholder(character,regex). > > What do you all think of the proposed name changes? I think it's > important to remain consistent with the base library. I want to make > sure that I get everything settled once I reach 1.0. > > Thanks > Josh > digitalbush.com
