Sorry, that was a cut & paste error in my post; yes, prototype is
included
above jquery.  The protoype code on the pageworks properly, but the
sliding
menu powered by jquery does not.

On Jun 29, 2:35 pm, "Ganeshji Marwaha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ur last option is the best :-)
>
> but, did u try adding prototype.js above jquery.js
>
> -GTG
>
> On 6/29/07, sprak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Greetings; I am having a bit of trouble getting JQuery 1.1.2 and
> > Prototype 1.5.0 to play
> > nice with each other.  Here is my page (abbreviated) and script with
> > JQuery alone.
>
> > HTML:
> > <html>
> > <head>
> > ...
> > <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="/design/en/
> > javascript/finest200706/jquery-latest.js"></script>
> > <script>
> > jQuery.noConflict();
> > </script>
> > </head>
> > <body>
> > ...
> > <div id="mainNav">
> > <ul id="menu">
> > <li>
> >      <a href="/solutions">Solutions</a>
> >      <ul>
> >           <li>
> >                <a class="" href="/solutions/your_needs">Your Needs</a>
> >                <ul>
> >                     <li><a class="skip" href="/solutions/your_needs/
> > network_protection">Network Protection</a></li>
> >                </ul>
> >           </li>
> >      </ul>
> > </li>
> > ...
> > <li>
> >      <a class="open" href="/portal">Portal</a>
> >      <ul>
> >           <li><a class="skip" href="/pref">Preferences</a></li>
> >      </ul>
> > </li>
> > </ul>
> > ...
> > </div>
> > </body>
> > </html>
>
> > Script:
> > jQuery(document).ready(function() {
> >     // mainnav BEGIN
> >     // add a state on all the menus:
> >     jQuery("#mainNav > ul li > a + ul").attr("toggle", "down");
> >     // collapse all but class=open:
> >     jQuery("#mainNav > ul li > a").not(".open").find("+
> > ul").slideUp(1).attr("toggle", "up");
> >     // click handler sub menu on level 1
> >     jQuery("#mainNav > ul > li > a:not(.skip)").click(function() {
> >         var menu = jQuery(this).find("+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]'up']");
> >         menu.slideDown("slow");
> >         jQuery("#mainNav > ul li > a +
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'down']").slideUp("slow").attr("toggle", "up");
> >         menu.attr("toggle", "down");
> >         return false;
> >     });
> >     // click handler sub menu on level 2
> >     jQuery("#mainNav > ul > li > ul > li >
> > a:not(.skip)").click(function() {
> >         var menu = jQuery(this).find("+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]'up']");
> >         menu.slideDown("slow");
> >         jQuery("#mainNav > ul > li > ul > li > a:not(.open) +
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'down']").slideUp("slow").attr("toggle", "up");
> >         menu.attr("toggle", "down");
> >         return false;
> >     });
> >     // load page if skipped from accordeon fx:
> >     jQuery("#mainNav > ul > li a.skip").click(function() {
> >         document.location.href = jQuery(this).attr("href");
> >         return true;
> >     });
> >     // mainnav END
> > });
>
> > The menu appears with one item already open specified by a <a> tag
> > with
> > class="open".  Clicking on a closed menu item slides that menu open
> > and closes
> > the one already open.  This sliding effect works fine without
> > Prototype added.
>
> > Once I add Prototype by modifying my HTML like this:
> > <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="/design/en/
> > javascript/finest200706/jquery-latest.js"></script>
> > <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="/design/en/
> > javascript/prototype.js"></script>
> > <script>
> > jQuery.noConflict();
> > </script>
>
> > The sliding effect stops; no errors are reported in Firebug or the
> > error console.
> > Using Firebug, I stepped through the code and found that buried deep
> > in the
> > code is a call to filter() that is going awry.
>
> > Without Prototype, the filter call gets to the end and properly
> > selects
> > the <ul> element from the document via + [EMAIL PROTECTED]'up'].  Once
> > Prototype
> > is added, the filter call holds the <ul> element until near the end;
> > haven't
> > debugged further, but it clobbers the return result and returns a
> > useless object.
>
> > Has anyone seen this before and know how to fix it other than ditching
> > Prototype?
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > - luis

Reply via email to