You could always preload images before hand (no need to use CSS
tricks).

http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/preload/

On Jul 5, 3:02 am, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's better than asking, is testing..
> <div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
>   <img src="path to image"/>
> </div>
> Much better.. Sorry if you felt I've wasted your time.
>
> On 5 Jul., 03:25, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Benjamin.
>
> > I would like to put visibility: hidden in my css for the elements
> > (it's thirty something divs with an image set as background) and then
> > use jQuery to display them. But so far I haven't had any success with
> > that approach - it only works if I set the css to display:none. By
> > doing so the browser won't download the images until the style is
> > changed (which is what jQuery does) but that looks awful in IE6. I
> > thought about just turning it off if it's IE6 (it's just eye candy)
> > but I'm not sure how to distinguish between IE6 and IE7. Sadly jQuery
> > only offers $.browser.msie. I've been digging in Ext to see how they
> > do it but only found isIE flag code. And I'm running out of time
> > so... :-( puh I'm gonna grab another cup of coffee..
>
> > Do you think it would work if I use
> > <div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
> > <img src="path to image"/>
> > </div>
> > instead of background images?
>
> > On 5 Jul., 03:01, "Benjamin Sterling"
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jon,
> > > I don't completely understand what you are asking for; Are you asking if
> > > there is a way to "preload" images and have them hidden with out
> > > display:none?
>
> > > If so:
>
> > > <div style="position:absolute;left:-2000px;>
> > > <img src="path to image"/>
> > > </div>
>
> > > Are you asking for filter out elements with display:none?
>
> > > If so:
>
> > > $('*').filter(':hidden');  //  I may be wrong on this one
>
> > > On 7/4/07, Jon Ege Ronnenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi all!
>
> > > > Is it possible to show elements that is not CSS display:none;? In my 
> > > > case
> > > > I'm showing some pictures and I don't like that the browser only 
> > > > downloads
> > > > the pictures when I show them through jQuery. I would prefer if the 
> > > > browser
> > > > downloaded all the pictures and then I would show them though jQuery. I 
> > > > know
> > > > I can do it by changing the CSS instead of using show(), animate, 
> > > > slideDown
> > > > etc. But I like the easing effect and I'm not sure of to achieve that by
> > > > setting css.
>
> > > > Any ideas to a workaround or someone who can explain to me why jQuery 
> > > > took
> > > > this approach?
>
> > > > Thanks!
>
> > > > Don't misunderstand me - I really like jQuery (and especially its
> > > > simplicity).
>
> > > --
> > > Benjamin Sterlinghttp://www.KenzoMedia.comhttp://www.KenzoHosting.com

Reply via email to