Oh, I see where you're going...
Well, I'd personally choose to 'make-do' with built-in selectors for the
sake of performance.
But it's good to have the option...
On 05/07/07, Aaron Heimlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Basically, I'm wondering if something like this is feasible:
>
> if ( (type == "" && !!z ||
> type == "=" && z == m[5] ||
> type == "!=" && z != m[5] ||
> type == "^=" && z && !z.indexOf(m[5]) ||
> type == "$=" && z.substr(z.length - m[5].length) == m[5] ||
> (type == "*=" || type == "~=") && z.indexOf(m[5]) >= 0) ^ not ) {
> tmp.push( a );
> } else {
> // Check jQuery.expr["@"] for custom attribute selectors
> }
>
> On 7/5/07, Diego A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to help but you've lost me there Aaron...
> >
> > Is it possible to attach an "else" to the "if" statement that replaced
> > > it[1] that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > On 05/07/07, Aaron Heimlich < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/5/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We
> > > > really wanted to keep the extensible functionality of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > but it
> > > > ended up being just to incredibly slow. Moving all of the code
> > > > internal was the only way to receive any sort of speed up. Sorry
> > > > about
> > > > that guys.
> > > >
> > > > --John
> > >
> > >
> > > Is it possible to attach an "else" to the "if" statement that replaced
> > > it[1] that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/tags/1.1.3.1/src/selector/selector.js#L345
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Aaron Heimlich
> > > Web Developer
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Aaron Heimlich
> Web Developer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://aheimlich.freepgs.com
> >
>
