oops, fixed. Also, I fixed a mistake in the template. I was including 2 heads/body tags.
If anyone has a page they wanted to test, I can make it live. Send me 1. Source of the page without any JS. (Css paths should be absolute) 2. A list of selectors you want to test. Should be specific to your page. 3. donate $1 to jQuery ;) Glen On 7/11/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glen, you have a typo in the test. It should be jQuery v1.1.3.1! ;) Glen Lipka wrote: > Actually, I am putting my money where my mouth is: > http://www.commadot.com/jquery/speedtest/ > > This shows library SIZE and it also uses an actual website. (My blog, > which is typical of normal WordPress blogs). > > I'm still playing with the selectors. not sure why some didnt find > anything. > > Glen > > On 7/11/07, *Rey Bango* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > > Jack actually points out the fact that "div div div" is pointless. He > also gives a lot of kudos to jQuery and I'm glad for that. He even > mentioned John's nth child script and how well-written it is. I like the > fact that he, in a roundabout way, calls out other libs on the use of > pointless selectors and the tweaking towards XPath. > > I would venture to say that when SlickSpeed was first posted by > MooTools, very few developers actually compared the results in IE. IE is > still the dominant browser and if you look at the performance of the > libs in IE, you'll see that jQuery really performed well while others > fell on their face. > > While the results don't show us to the be the fastest, I think the post > helps to validate John Resig's position that the selectors in these > tests don't represent real-world examples and certainly shows the lack > of consistent performance by other libs when using the leading browser. > > In terms of performance, we're well within effective speed ranges so as > you mentioned, Glen, 10ms is irrelevant. I see this as Jack's way of > quieting the other groups and not specifically targeted at jQuery. > > Rey... > > > Glen Lipka wrote: > > http://extjs.com/blog/2007/07/10/css-selectors-speed-myths/ > > > > <rant> > > "div div div", we are slowest by like 50 ms, but "div div" we are not > > slowest, and within 9ms of the leader. > > Who uses "div div div"? > > > > <pun> > > What "div"ference does it make? > > </pun> > > > > Plus, some of the libraries are packed, and some are > not. (jQuery is not) > > > > Would that change the results? > > > > Are we really nitpicking about 10's of milliseconds? > > No mention of file size again. No mention of capabilities in the > core. > > > > </rant> > > > > Glen > > -- > BrightLight Development, LLC. > 954-775-1111 (o) > 954-600-2726 (c) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://www.iambright.com <http://www.iambright.com> > > -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775-1111 (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com
