On Aug 14, 3:34 pm, Blair Mitchelmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (Though I think the next step in improving how plugins interoperate is > allowing multiple plugins to operate under the same name by having the > plugin provide some sort of argument test to determine if the provided > arguments are valid and then using that plugin on a case by case > basis)
i think namespaces would be a better idea, e.g.: $(...).blair.start(...); $(...).blair.stop(...) i don't know if that type of thing is possible using the current jQ code. That sounds like a good question for the list.
