Rey, that is sweet. I did not see that on the plug in page, nor in a google search, is that yours?
On 8/22/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does this jQuery plugin not work? > > http://uiupload.webunity.nl/ > > Rey... > > Josh Nathanson wrote: > > It is not that shocking to me -- these are some difficult requirements > > that developers have always struggled with, as far as Javascript > > solutions -- especially numbers 4 and 7. Flash seems to handle > > multi-file uploads a little more easily. > > > > If mootools has been able to overcome these obstacles in pure JS that is > > very impressive. > > > > Have at it Benjamin! > > > > -- Josh > > > > Wow, it is shocking the none of jQuery file uploaders have those > > ability. That may be something I need to work on. Very shocking. > > > > I wish I knew how to get around the mootools issue, just never > > worked with it before. > > > > On 8/22/07, *Jack Killpatrick* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > I want to do this and have evaluated and tried a few plain-js > > and jquery based solutions: > > > > http://digitarald.de/playground/uplooad.html > > > > required abilities: > > > > 1. select multiple files at once via browse dialog > > 2. list all selected files separately > > 3. remove any selected file before uploading and during upload > > (if not started) > > 4. per-item progress bars (and ability for individual uploads to > > complete before whole batch does) > > 5. clear completed list easily > > > > Nice to haves: > > > > 6. restrict selections by file extension > > 7. file-size limit enforced on client side > > > > Additionally: I'm looking for a solution that has most/all of > > this already packaged (since this mootools uploader does and has > > therefore set the bar) so that implementation time will be > minimal. > > > > FWIW, all of the jq-based plugins I've looked at so far did not > > meet *all* requirements or came close, but had various > > browser-specific issues (crashing browsers, not loading from > > local cache) that made us give up on them. > > > > - Jack > > > > Benjamin Sterling wrote: > >> @GTG, great question, I second that. > >> > >> @Jack, if you can explain what you are trying to do with > >> mootools, maybe we can come up with an alternative. > >> > >> On 8/22/07, *Ganeshji Marwaha* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > >> I don't think there is a way to make mootools play well > >> with other libraries when using the infamous "$". jQuery > >> is probably the only library that understands this concern > >> and has implemented appropriate precautions in its code > base. > >> > >> That said, to look at ur needs from a higher level, i > >> think i will first need to understand what is that u r > >> doing with mootools that can't be done in jquery. If we > >> are able to easily achieve the same using jQuery, then you > >> wont have to use mootools at all in the first place... > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Benjamin Sterling > > http://www.KenzoMedia.com > > http://www.KenzoHosting.com > -- Benjamin Sterling http://www.KenzoMedia.com http://www.KenzoHosting.com
