Did you remember to include the color animation plugin?
--John
On 9/12/07, Equand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement...
> thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature...
>
> On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to report also a 100% no-conflict upgrade to 1.2! Thanks
> > for the hard work and the quick output.
> >
> > That being said, I can't get offset() to work like expected. I use
> > Dimensions offset() on my site in a tricky situation involving floats,
> > padding, margin, etc. I tried to switch into offset() from the 1.2
> > core and I can't get it to work as expected, and I can't seem to
> > pinpoint where it is failing. I tried to alter it slightly to pass it
> > a different parentNode (as in Dimensions { relativeTo: element }) but
> > the left: was still wrong. I also get different results from FF
> > 2.0.0.6, IE6, and Opera 9.20.
> >
> > Can you describe how the core offset() method works compared to the
> > Dimensions offset() method? I know from the source the Dimensions
> > offset() takes into account many different special cases, and
> > offsetLite seems closer to core offset(), but not the same. I would
> > like to add the info into the Wiki so coders will know when to use
> > Dimensions and when core offset() is enough.
> >
> > When I get home from work I'll try to get an example up, right now the
> > site is back to Dimensions until I figure this out.
> >
> > Charles
> > doublerebel.com
> >
> > On Sep 12, 8:58 am, "Web Specialist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jörn,
> >
> > > I know your great job in form validation plugin. Form Validation Plugin is
> > > awesome. Period!
> >
> > > I'll waiting that improvements looking for better performance.
> >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > > 2007/9/12, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Bernd Matzner schrieb:
> >
> > > > >> I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery
> > > > >> 1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using
> > > > >> uncompressed
> > > > >> version returns in 6 sec.
> >
> > > > > Hi, somewhat unrelated to the thread: 6 or even 16 secs seem like an
> > > > > eternity. What would be the disadvantages of using server-side
> > > > > validation in such a case? I'm asking this because I keep wondering if
> > > > > server-side validation is necessary anyway for non-JS visitors, why
> > > > > not use Ajax and do the validation on the server and simply display
> > > > > the errors using JS if available...
> >
> > > > Please note that I never even tried to optimize the validation plugin
> > > > for performance. I never had to deal with "monster forms", and still
> > > > consider them problematic anyway. But it seems like there are quite a
> > > > few people who have to deal with those monster forms, once I've got a
> > > > testcase setup it should be possible to improve the performance a lot. I
> > > > just have to find the actual bottleneck.
> >
> > > > I guess serializing a monster form and sending it via ajax and then
> > > > displaying messages via JS won't be that much faster.
> >
> > > > -- Jörn
>
>
