Did you remember to include the color animation plugin? --John
On 9/12/07, Equand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i also had a no conflict upgrade and a little speed enhancement... > thought there's a problem with animate bg new feature... > > On Sep 12, 11:37 pm, polyrhythmic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to report also a 100% no-conflict upgrade to 1.2! Thanks > > for the hard work and the quick output. > > > > That being said, I can't get offset() to work like expected. I use > > Dimensions offset() on my site in a tricky situation involving floats, > > padding, margin, etc. I tried to switch into offset() from the 1.2 > > core and I can't get it to work as expected, and I can't seem to > > pinpoint where it is failing. I tried to alter it slightly to pass it > > a different parentNode (as in Dimensions { relativeTo: element }) but > > the left: was still wrong. I also get different results from FF > > 2.0.0.6, IE6, and Opera 9.20. > > > > Can you describe how the core offset() method works compared to the > > Dimensions offset() method? I know from the source the Dimensions > > offset() takes into account many different special cases, and > > offsetLite seems closer to core offset(), but not the same. I would > > like to add the info into the Wiki so coders will know when to use > > Dimensions and when core offset() is enough. > > > > When I get home from work I'll try to get an example up, right now the > > site is back to Dimensions until I figure this out. > > > > Charles > > doublerebel.com > > > > On Sep 12, 8:58 am, "Web Specialist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Jörn, > > > > > I know your great job in form validation plugin. Form Validation Plugin is > > > awesome. Period! > > > > > I'll waiting that improvements looking for better performance. > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > 2007/9/12, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Bernd Matzner schrieb: > > > > > > >> I'm using Jorn's Form Validation in a monster form. Using jQuery > > > > >> 1.2minified version returns all validation in =~ 16 sec. Using > > > > >> uncompressed > > > > >> version returns in 6 sec. > > > > > > > Hi, somewhat unrelated to the thread: 6 or even 16 secs seem like an > > > > > eternity. What would be the disadvantages of using server-side > > > > > validation in such a case? I'm asking this because I keep wondering if > > > > > server-side validation is necessary anyway for non-JS visitors, why > > > > > not use Ajax and do the validation on the server and simply display > > > > > the errors using JS if available... > > > > > > Please note that I never even tried to optimize the validation plugin > > > > for performance. I never had to deal with "monster forms", and still > > > > consider them problematic anyway. But it seems like there are quite a > > > > few people who have to deal with those monster forms, once I've got a > > > > testcase setup it should be possible to improve the performance a lot. I > > > > just have to find the actual bottleneck. > > > > > > I guess serializing a monster form and sending it via ajax and then > > > > displaying messages via JS won't be that much faster. > > > > > > -- Jörn > >