Rodrigo,
This has now been implemented along with some additional features.
jqMultiSelects v0.2 is available from
http://code.google.com/p/jqmultiselects/
Cheers,
--rob
On 10/22/07, Rob Desbois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Rodrigo,
>
> Apologies for the massive time in replying, I am very busy these days.
>
> That is a great suggestion, and one which a few people have mentioned. I
> will modify the official plugin source as soon as possible, but for now your
> fix does just great :-)
>
> All the best
> --rob
>
> On 9/22/07, Rodrigo Moraes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hey Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for jqMultiSelects. Useful one. :)
> >
> > One suggestion: let the user decide the selectors that will be used
> > for the elements, instead of forcing an ID. I modified it to allow
> > this:
> >
> > jQuery.fn.multiSelect = function(to, button) {
> > return this.each(function() {
> > var select = this;
> > jQuery(this).dblclick(function() {
> > moveOptions(select, to);
> > });
> >
> > if (typeof button != "undefined") {
> > jQuery(button).click(function() {
> > moveOptions(select, to);
> > });
> > }
> > });
> >
> > function moveOptions(from, to) {
> > jQuery(from).children("option:selected").each(function() {
> > jQuery(this)
> > .attr("selected", false)
> > .appendTo(to);
> > });
> > }
> > };
> >
> > Then it can be called like this:
> >
> > $("#select_left").multiSelect("#select_right", "#options_right");
> > $("#select_right").multiSelect("#select_left", "#options_left");
> >
> > Don't you think it is less restrictive?
> > -- rodrigo
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rob Desbois
> Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: 07946 705987
> "There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish" he cried, and the
> whale was in full view.
> ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
--
Rob Desbois
Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 07946 705987
"There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish" he cried, and the
whale was in full view.
...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
