Hi Karl ,
I am also think that kim may be change the subject topic. Also my
intention is to get your comments about the jquery youtube plugin and
make it more powerful. However i think this thread create confuse for
new come so agin i post the message .
Thanks
Saidur
On Dec 10, 5:12 am, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my email client, Kim's first post was threaded along with Saidur's
> "jquery youtube plugin" post.
>
> Kim, is it possible that you replied to a "jquery youtube plugin"
> email and just changed the subject line? If so, that could why Saidur
> is complaining. It's important to start new topics with a brand new
> email message (if you're posting via email, of course) rather than
> hitting "reply" from another topic. If you did open a new mail
> message, then maybe something went wrong on the Google Groups side of
> things. In any case, I hope this helps explain Saidur's concern.
>
> As for Firebug, I've seen the issue you're having quite a bit with
> classes. Sometimes when I add a class to a DOM element, in Firebug
> it'll just show as class="". I think your hunch is correct that it's a
> Firebug, rather than a jQuery, issue.
>
> --Karl
> _________________
> Karl Swedbergwww.englishrules.comwww.learningjquery.com
>
> On Dec 9, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>
>
>
> > I looks like Kim started a whole new thread to me. Maybe you're
> > having a problem with your email client, Saidur?
>
> > On Dec 9, 2007 7:10 AM, Saidur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Hi kim why you change the discusson subject.
>
> >> On Dec 9, 3:30 pm, Kim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
>
> >>> I just spent the last hour trying to figure out why a
> >>> piece of jquery wasn't working, and finally tracked it
> >>> down to inaccurately assuming you could overwrite an
> >>> attribute with attr. Using attr to blank out values
> >>> (ex: .attr("name", "")) seems to work fine, but as
> >>> soon as I try to use it with an actual variable (ex:
> >>> .attr("id", idvar)), nothing happns.
>
> >>> I finally discovered that the code worked perfectly if
> >>> I called removeAttr("id") first, prior to the
> >>> .attr("id", idvar) call.
>
> >>> Can anyone explain to me why overwriting doesn't work
> >>> with attr? Is this a bug? Am I missing some kind of
> >>> core concept?
>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> ~Kim
>
> >>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> >>> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
