These are my (total) results:

IE7
Prototype: 2199 ms
Mootools: 1546 ms
jQuery: 1336 ms

FF2
Prototype: 326 ms
Mootools: 390 ms
jQuery: 1092 ms

SAFARI3
Prototype: 896 ms
Mootools: 279 ms
jQuery: 452 ms

So, there seem to be big differences between IE, Safari and FF, both in
overall DOM/Javascript speed (FF seems to be a LOT faster) and in the
different libraries. In IE jQuery is the big winner, in FF the big
loser.

Regards,
Jesse Klaasse.


-----Original Message-----
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:22 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Performance of jquery
Importance: Low


maybe it depends on your browser and/or pc, it seems fastest when I run
the test...

-ark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sharique" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jQuery (English)" <jquery-en@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:10 AM
Subject: [jQuery] Performance of jquery


| 
| Pls have a look at this test.
| http://mootools.net/slickspeed/
| Performance of JQuery of quite low as compare to other java script
| libraries.
| --
| Sharique

Reply via email to