> On Dec 22, 12:55 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By moving this code into a function, a new variable "i" is created each time
> the function is called. You no longer have all the code sharing a single
> variable - each instance of the function gets its own.
Ah, brilliant. I see that distinction/technique used a lot in jQuery.
The fact that methods are first-class objects is incredibly powerful;
I have yet to fully utilize it. Thanks for the help, Michael. :)
---
On Dec 22, 12:55 am, "Michael Geary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an alternative to the other solution you posted, here is how you can do
> it with code more like the code below:
>
> for(var i = 0; i < 30; i++)
> clicker( i );
>
> function clicker( i ) {
> jQuery('#day_' + i).click(function() {
> console.log('i is ' + i);
> jQuery('#day_' + i + '_modal').jqmShow();
> });
>
> }
>
> As you can see, all I changed was to put your code inside a function and
> call that function 30 times.
>
> Why did your original code show "i is 30" for each element? Because there is
> only a single variable "i", and when you call console.log it's using the
> current value of "i" - not the value that "i" had at the time you added the
> click event.
>
> By moving this code into a function, a new variable "i" is created each time
> the function is called. You no longer have all the code sharing a single
> variable - each instance of the function gets its own.
>
> -Mike
>
> > From: Rabbit
>
> > The following code:
>
> > for(var i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
> > jQuery('#day_' + i).click(function() {
> > console.log('i is ' + i);
> > jQuery('#day_' + i + '_modal').jqmShow();
> > });
> > }
>
> > Runs, but always reports "i is 30".
>
> > Now, I understand why it does that, but why doesn't the
> > jqmShow method work? It appears as though the code that "gets
> > executed" is dynamic.
> > In other words, when the click event occurs JavaScript looks
> > up the code as it was at the end of its execution, when
> > variable i is 30, instead of "remembering" that at one point
> > it was something else.
>
> > Did that make sense?
>
> > Any ideas how to get around this without typing in all 30
> > click events?
