Great! It could be even better if you can have some most popular plugins included.
Thanks, Jiming On Jun 3, 2:55 am, Seth - TA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scottus > > Nifty idea. > > Suggestion - Look to implement plugin options as well. Keeping track > of versions is a benefit and the speed improvement is nice to a > degree, but the biggest struggle is I hate having to have 5 or 6 > <script> tags calling plugins. I hate combining them into on js file > too, because then it is just an unreadable cluster. It would be nice > to take plugins submitted by plugin authors and have a naming > convention to also include these. That would drastically improve load > times. You could utilize the plugin library which currently exists on > jquery.com and add an option for the google name which is used to call > the plugin. Just a thought. > > Seth > > On Jun 2, 12:36 pm, aldomatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Not yet, but I plan on using it here in a day or so. Looks intresting > > so far. > > > On Jun 2, 12:16 pm, cfdvlpr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is anyone using this for jQuery yet? To do this, you can just use > > > this line of code, right? > > > > <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.2.6/ > > > jquery.min.js"/>
