On 11 Jun., 12:23, MorningZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just simply use document.getElementById? (which > ultimately .val() uses anyways)
The snippet given here didn't even contain an id. --Klaus
On 11 Jun., 12:23, MorningZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just simply use document.getElementById? (which > ultimately .val() uses anyways)
The snippet given here didn't even contain an id. --Klaus