Mike,

Thank you for the quick response.

I throught I should take a look in the jquery easing file, seen as the
transitions work - and the names of the easing transitions changed in
version 1.2 of the easing plugin.

Problem solved.

Thanks

   - Wayne

On Jun 21, 2:54 pm, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have searched this group to see if anyone is getting the same issue
> > as I have been but after about an hour of searching I did not find
> > anything.
>
> > I am trying to put a simple slideshow on my homepage of my new website
> > but the effect that I want just does not seem to work for some reason.
> > I have looked through all of my code and made sure that I have
> > included all of the JS files properly (and that they exist on the
> > remote server).
>
> > I can load the slideshow with other effects, I have also kept the
> > easing code in on effects such as fade etc. to make sure that the
> > error is not with that, but it still works. As soon as I change the
> > effect type everything goes tits up and the slideshow does not work.
>
> > I have uploaded all files to a beta url 
> > -http://beta.waynegrills.com/?fx=zoom&ease=false
>
> > I have made the script so that you can change the effect my changing
> > the fx variable in the URL and define whether the easing is included
> > or not by setting ease to true or false.
>
> > I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> >    - Wayne
>
> Two things:
>
> 1.) Give the container an explicit height:
>
> <style type="text/css">
> #home2 { height: 200px }
> </style>
>
> 2.)  Use a timeout value that makes sense.  What you have now does not
> make sense:
>
> $('#home2').cycle({
>     fx:      'scrollDown',
>     speedIn:  2000,
>     speedOut: 500,
>     timeout:  600,
>     pause:    1,
>     after:    onAfter
>
> });
>
> The 'timeout' option tells Cycle how often to switch slides.  But
> having a value that is less than the time it takes to perform the
> transition (speedIn + speedOut) makes no sense.  Maybe this was just a
> typo and you meant 6000 instead of 600?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mike

Reply via email to