Normally I'd agree, but the real problem isn't so much the cost as the bureaucracy involved in licensing software here, even if it only does cost $20. I tried to talk the boss into making a donation to jQuery on the grounds that it's getting more and more use on our site, the development effort deserved acknowledgement and it couldn't hurt publicity wiae, but while he agreed he turned me down because the paperwork would have been rejected.
On Jul 2, 3:46 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why you can't download the free version for testing > and then demo it to your boss. If he/she wants it, $20 can be found. > (And if your boss can't find $20 extra dollars, you might want to > abandon that sinking ship! One less pizza and you've got a great plug-in! :o) > > Rick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gordon > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:19 AM > > To: jQuery (English) > > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Shadowbox 2.0rc1 > > > I was having a few problems with the first shadowbox and was > > interested to see if there were additions that would get me around > > them, but it seems the license has changed and I don't think I can get > > my employer to fork out for a license as money is currently very > > tight. > > > On Jul 1, 5:44 pm, "Michael J. I. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > If you're using the Shadowbox jQuery plugin, it has been updated. The > > > new version features increased flexibility and stability for various > > > media types. It also includes much better support for i18n and > > > skinning. Just wanted to let you know in case you are using it. > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.3/1529 - Release Date: 7/1/2008 > > 7:23 PM
