This would work too:
if($("#option02:checked").length)
-- Yehuda
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Micky Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Ok, I need to stop floundering around!
>
> Hehe... This is what I wanted:
>
> if($('#option02').is(':checked'))
>
> I think I need to read the docs... jQuery site is down for me
> though... Anyway, I am still looking for links to jQuery form
> tutorials! :)
>
> Have a great day all.
>
> Micky
>
> On Jul 20, 11:57 am, Micky Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess this would be even better:
> >
> > $("#option01:checked")
> >
> > Not sure why I did not think of that earlier. :)
> >
> > On Jul 20, 11:53 am, Micky Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I have a form (#fmSearch) with three radio buttons:
> >
> > > <input name="options" value="a.html" id="option01" type="radio"> ...
> > > <input name="options" value="b.html" id="option02" type="radio"> ...
> > > <input name="options" value="c.html" id="option03" type="radio"> ...
> >
> > > When testing for a specific radio button, which of the below
> > > techniques is faster/better?
> >
> > > $('#option01').attr('checked', 'checked');
> >
> > > or
> >
> > > $("[EMAIL PROTECTED]'option01']:checked")
> >
> > > If I had to guess, I would say the the first option is faster... but I
> > > like the readability of the second one better.
> >
> > > Anyone know of a good tutorial that details how to wok with forms
> > > using jQuery (sans-plugins)?
> >
> > > Many thanks in advance!
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Micky
>
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
