Is there really a lot of code that relies on it? If there is, wouldn't Chrome break on many more pages? I don't recall seeing any code that assumes an order.
--tt On Sep 4, 1:32 pm, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but every other implementation does that, so a lot of code > implicitly relies on this. You don't really expect programmers to read > language specs, do you? > > Jörn > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Matt Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sep 4, 2:00 pm, Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The second one is a bug in V8 (or Chrome). It returns reversed > >> enumeration order of keys if the object is a literal. > > > This is not a bug in V8. The order of keys is never guaranteed to be > > in the order they are inserted or specified in a literal. > > > Matt Kruse
