Try this:
$('.sMarker ~ row', myTable).not($('.eMarker ~ row', myTable))
That will get what you want, but I think it won't include the .sMarker row.
To get .sMarker also, maybe try:
$('.sMarker,.sMarker ~ row', myTable).not($('.eMarker ~ row', myTable))
You can also do it by index without each() like this:
var $rows = $('row', myTable);
var $range = $rows.slice($rows.index($rows.filter('.sMarker')),
$rows.index($rows.filter('.eMarker'))+1);
Hope it helps.
--Erik
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, greenteam003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I really don't know why I'm having such a hard time with this (maybe its
> the
> two monsters and three cups of coffee) but I'm trying to select a range of
> rows in a 1000 row xhtml table, between starting row with class "sMarker"
> and ending row with class "eMarker". I'm trying to use the following
> selector...
>
> $('.sMarker ~ row:not(".eMarker ~ row")',myTable)
>
> In my mind this should take my ".sMarker" row, grab all sibling rows after,
> and then filter out any rows that come after my ".eMarker" row. Or am I
> just overthinking this?
>
> Currently that selector will select ALL rows after my ".sMarker" excluding
> the single row marked with ".eMarker".
>
> Note: To filter out any responses that are blindingly obvious, the table
> row tags in my xhtml are really "row" not tr.
>
> I don't know how else to get this "between" functionality without using
> indexes and the each iteration is a huge performance loss when dealing with
> larger tables.
>
> Please help because I can not wrap my head around this one this morning.
>
> Thanks,
> greenteam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/XHTML-Selector-Nightmare-tp19766491s27240p19766491.html
> Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
