Right. Autoupdated documentation browsers that use the content from
the wiki are a high priority! We're slowly getting somewhere.

Jörn

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Rainaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Exactly!!! Thank you... I'm finding that the documentation is not very
> easy to navigate on the jquery site...
>
> the information I wanted was there all along, I just couldn't find it.
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nevermind, your reply, pointing to toggle, should be what he was looking for.
>>
>> Jörn
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> FAIL.   :-(
>>>
>>> On Oct 14, 2:31 pm, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> or at least I tried to change the subject... hrm...
>>>>
>>>> second try.
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 14, 2:31 pm, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I'm sorry, I don't have an answer, but I have edited the subject line
>>>> > of the message so that the people that *can* help can better identify
>>>> > the message.
>>>>
>>>> > I did notice that there's a "toggle:" callback function. Check out the
>>>> > documentation (click over to the Options 
>>>> > tab):http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Treeview/treeview
>>>>
>>>> > "Callback when toggling a branch. Arguments: "this" refers to the UL
>>>> > that was shown or hidden. Works only with speed option set (set speed:
>>>> > 1 to enable callback without animations)."
>>>>
>>>> > documentation example:
>>>> > $(".selector").treeview({
>>>> >    toggle: function() {
>>>> >         console.log(this + " has been toggled");
>>>> >    }
>>>>
>>>> > })
>>>>
>>>> > -E
>>>>
>>>> > On Oct 14, 1:08 pm, Rainaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > I would like to be able to dynamically assign aditional functionality
>>>> > > to the onclick event within the treeview list structure so that it
>>>> > > would not only expand the tree display, but also perform a function
>>>> > > which I assign to the list element.
>>>>
>>>> > > Is this possible?
>>>>
>>>> > > Thank you
>>>>
>>>> > > Robert Zumwalt
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to