Ouch.  Looking further, I guess IE has filters that can handle some similar
things  to <canvas> (ie: lighten, but not change brightness, etc), but I'll
attempt to find other solutions before we go that way (or just try to get
them to find someone to do it in flash).
Thanks muchly.
  josh

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, ricardobeat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Those kind of effects are only possible in Firefox through the use of
> the <canvas> element, which IE doesn't support. The only cross-browser
> ways do to it currently would be using Flash or processing the image
> server-side and reloading it.
>
>
> On Oct 23, 2:56 pm, "Josh Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey Folks,
> > So, a project involving allowing users to view scanned photos of historic
> > structures has recently run into the problem that some of the photos are
> a
> > bit dark relative to the originals, with some details being impossible to
> > see in the jpg.  When viewed on desktop, this is usually dealt with by
> users
> > just tweaking the brightness in their quick and easy photo viewer of
> choice.
> >  I'm trying to replicate that functionality for a web interface we're
> > developing.
> >
> > Does anyone know of an image control jquery plugin that allows brightness
> > control, or has anyone dealt with similar issues?  Optimally, it'd be
> > something lightbox-esque, with FF3/IE7+ compatability, but I'd love to
> see
> > any examples at all.
> >
> > Poking around, I've found a few potential leads if I have to try to build
> > something, but I'm hoping someone out there has beaten me to it.
> >
> > In case anyone is curious, the leads I ran across were:
> > FF Only:http://people.mozilla.com/~schrep/image12.html
> > and:http://www.nihilogic.dk/labs/imagefx/
> > and lastly:
> > processing.js seems to have similar capabilities, but I've never done
> > anything with it and thus have no idea how easy/nightmarish it'd be to
> add a
> > brightness slider or +/-10% button to an image.  Also, compatibility is
> > problematic.
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > josh
>

Reply via email to