Thanks Jorn.

I can say that I've tested the integration of autocomplete and dialog now. :)  
So far so good.

What I was missing was the change from .autocomplete(url/data, options) 
to .autocomplete({url: "", data:"", etc.}).  Once I found that the plugin 
worked fine.  I have not seen any errors per se.  However I did notice 
the .result() is not binding (or perhaps I'm using it wrong... was planning 
on looking into that today).

But, if autocomplete will not be included until 1.7, then I should probably 
just use your plugin, rather than UI's version.

Thanks for the info.

Shawn



On Sunday 26 October 2008 06:27:30 Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
> My plugin was planned for inclusion in 1.6, but won't be part of the
> final release, it was deferred to 1.7. The UI version is adapter to
> the UI API and has two or three new features.
>
> A list of changes since the 1.0 release is here:
> http://jquery.bassistance.de/autocomplete/changelog.txt (1.0.2 just
> fixed some missing semicolon)
>
> There hasn't been any testing or documentation effort for integration
> of dialog and autocomplete. I've created a ticket for that:
> http://ui.jquery.com/bugs/ticket/3519
>
> Jörn
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1.  Is there any difference between Jorn's autocomplete from his webpage
> > (http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/) and
> > the one included in jQuery.ui 1.6rc2 ?  I can see the copyright info is
> > the same, but don't see a version number for the autocomplete element...
> >
> > 2. Using the jquery.ui version of autocomplete, what steps are needed to
> > make the autocomplete work properly in a modal dialog via jquery.ui's
> > dialog?  (my initial tests show the code working, but the result area is
> > not showing - I'm using a theme from the themeroller if that matters). 
> > I'm using a local data set for now.
> >
> > 3. It's been about a year since I last looked at autocomplete.  Anything
> > new that I should be aware off?  (I was using Jorn's plugin back then as
> > well...)
> >
> > Thanks for any info.
> >
> > Shawn


Reply via email to