As for JS, saving bytes is totally a good thing.
On Dec 30, 10:53 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <aplennev...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> why? It's just a shorthand, isn't it ? does it affect the computer
> resources in any manner ?
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Kean <shenan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just a nitpick.
>
> > Don't do this
> > var datascape = new Object();
> > var datascape2 = new Array();
>
> > Instead
> > var datascape = {};
> > var datascape2 = [];
>
> > On Dec 30, 1:27 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <aplennev...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> wair, you're all scarrying me:
>
> >> i often do things like this:
>
> >> var datascape = new Object();
>
> >> datascape.el = $('#datascape');
> >> datascape.ini = function(){
> >> datascape.el.click(function(){
> >> dothis();
> >> dothat();
> >> });
>
> >> }
>
> >> is this pattern causing a potential memory leak problem, because the
> >> js object is linked to a DOM element?
>
> >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Kean <shenan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > A good reason why closure is used
>
> >> >http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/06/01/global-domination/
>
> >> > On Dec 30, 1:04 pm, Kean <shenan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Klaus is right,
>
> >> >> Here's an article about closure causing
> >> >> leakshttp://www.javascriptkit.com/javatutors/closuresleak/index.shtml
>
> >> >> On Dec 30, 4:38 am, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <aplennev...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> > Klaus, you got me: frankly i have no "real" idea what is the purpose
> >> >> > of enclosure.
> >> >> > That's abstract art to me. i just read in several places that it's
> >> >> > good to use it, so i trust my sources, do it and move on. Not that i'm
> >> >> > proud of it, but, to use a metaphor, one does not need to know the
> >> >> > internals of a car in order to be able to drive it, although it surely
> >> >> > is a valuable knowledge if one wants to keep its car in a good state !
> >> >> > Yet, since the car changes every six months, it's just up to you,
> >> >> > wheather you're driven by the pure developer's passion or by consumer
> >> >> > pragmatism.
>
> >> >> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Klaus Hartl
> >> >> > <klaus.ha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> > > On 30 Dez., 08:45, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <aplennev...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > > wrote:
> >> >> > >> "JavaScript enclosures"?
>
> >> >> > >> i think it has to do with encapsulating your code inside a
> >> >> > >> function so
> >> >> > >> that all vars are inside the function's scope, so not cluttering
> >> >> > >> the
> >> >> > >> global namespace.
> >> >> > >> This, to avoid memory leak.
>
> >> >> > > Are you implying that global variables do leak memory? There are
> >> >> > > good
> >> >> > > reasons to not clutter the global namespace but I don't believe
> >> >> > > avoiding leaks is one of them.
>
> >> >> > > Actually you do increase the chance to create leaks in IE if you use
> >> >> > > closures under certain circumstances.
>
> >> >> > > --Klaus
