I find it more practical to use an anonymous function as in (function
($){..}(jQuery) and keep the '$' reference, or do all the work at once
to avoid confusion:
(function($){
$(...)
})( jQuery.noConflict() )
or
jQuery.noConflict()(function($){
$(...)
});
On Jan 7, 4:55 am, seasoup <seas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> noConflict was designed specifically with prototype in mind :)
>
> The easiest way to do both jQuery and proto is to do:
>
> var $j = jQuery.noConflict();
>
> and use $j instead of $ for jQuery.
>
> $j('#id'), for example.
>
> On Jan 6, 10:23 pm, Magnificent
>
> <imightbewrongbutidontthin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Erik, thanks for the reply. I've been messing with things and I
> > tried replacing my calls to local versions of prototype/scriptaculous
> > to use google:
>
> > <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.6.0.3/
> > prototype.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
> > <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/scriptaculous/1.8.2/
> > scriptaculous.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
>
> > And it seems to be working now. Does anyone know if there's a known
> > issue using jquery's noConflict() with prototype/scriptaculous? I'm
> > wondering if the (older) local version I was using was the culprit.
> > It looks like it.
