Ops! my faul! sorry.
Previous post errata.

Read: ...BEFORE the F element ...

instead of:  ...BEFORE the E element... 



  -----Mensagem Original----- 
  De: Mauricio (Maujor) Samy Silva 
  Para: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
  Enviada em: quarta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2009 09:24
  Assunto: Re: [jQuery] Re: tbody:first-child & thead


  Hi Alex,

  1-) Doesn't work because * E F:first-child * pseudo-class selector matches 
the F element that is the first child of the E element ONLY if there isn't 
another element BEFORE the E element within the parent E. See specs at: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/selector.html#first-child

   2-) If you have a thead or/and a tbody in your markup, to select the first 
thead use the pseudo-class :eq instead. 

  $("#myTable tbody:eq(0) tr").length )

  MaurĂ­cio
    -----Mensagem Original----- 
    De: Alex Wibowo 
    Para: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
    Enviada em: quarta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2009 08:33
    Assunto: [jQuery] Re: tbody:first-child & thead


    Hi Karl.. thanks for the reply...

    what i actually wanted is.... to select the first tbody.... thats why i 
specified tbody:first-child there....
    since a table can have multiple tbody... i want to select the first tbody.

    What I didnt understand is.... about the thead..

    the following works....


    <table id="myTable">
       <tbody>
            <tr>
             ....
            </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>

    $("#myTable  tbody:first-child  tr").length;


    but this doesnt work:



    <table id="myTable">
       <thead>
           <tr>
    ...
           </tr>
      </thead>

       <tbody>
            <tr>
             ....
            </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>

    $("#myTable  tbody:first-child  tr").length;


    I dont know how  thead causes the second code above not to work...





    On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Karl Rudd <karl.r...@gmail.com> wrote:


      tbody:first-child doesn't select the "first child of the tbody" it
      says "select the tbody that is the 'first-child' of it's parent".

      So what you are actually wanting to say is:

      $("#myTable tbody tr:first-child")

      Which is "select the tr that is the first child of tbody"

      http://docs.jquery.com/Selectors/firstChild

      Karl Rudd


      On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Alex Wibowo <alexwib...@gmail.com> wrote:
      > sorry.... i should say....
      > "how does that explain the behaviour when there's no thead" (because it
      > works when thead doesnt exist)
      >
      > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Alex Wibowo <alexwib...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
      >>
      >> how does that explain the behaviour when there's thead then??
      >>
      >>
      >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:47 PM, David Muir <davidkm...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
      >>>
      >>> It's because tbody:first-child is already selecting the tr, so you're
      >>> effectively doing:
      >>> tbody tr tr (where the first tr is the first child of tbody)
      >>>
      >>> Cheers,
      >>> David
      >>>
      >>>
      >>> Alex Wibowo wrote:
      >>>>
      >>>> Hi all,
      >>>>
      >>>> I have a code that counts the number of rows in a table...
      >>>>
      >>>> the table looks like:
      >>>>
      >>>> <table id="myTable">
      >>>>  <thead>
      >>>>   ...
      >>>>   </thead>
      >>>>
      >>>>   <tbody>
      >>>>        <tr>
      >>>>         ....
      >>>>        </tr>
      >>>>  </tbody>
      >>>> </table>
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> and my jquery looks like:
      >>>>
      >>>> $("#myTable  tbody:first-child  tr").length;
      >>>>
      >>>> strange enough.... that always returns 0.
      >>>> but if i remove the thead from the table... then it will return the
      >>>> correct number of rows..
      >>>>
      >>>> or alternatively, i can keep the thead, but use the following 
instead:
      >>>>
      >>>> $("#myTable  tbody  tr").length;
      >>>>
      >>>> i.e. without specifying first-child.
      >>>>
      >>>> Can anyone explain this behaviour?
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> THanks a lot!
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> --
      >>>> Best regards,
      >>>>
      >>>>
      >>>> WiB
      >>>>
      >>>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> --
      >> Best regards,
      >>
      >>
      >> WiB
      >>
      >
      >
      >
      > --
      > Best regards,
      >
      >
      > WiB
      >
      >




    -- 
    Best regards,


    WiB

Reply via email to