Thanks for the reply brian I appreciate it. I ended up not bothering with the fadeTo() and just set a class on the TR which in-turn styled the TD's with some opacity using CSS, this way I get the desired fade effect but without the nice animation, it'll do as a compromise until M$ pull their thumb out.
However, do you think this is worth reporting to the jQuery bugs list, perhaps its a quirk they can work in? Rob On Feb 27, 2:29 pm, Brian Schilt <motoxr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, thats IE for ya. I've done something similar and I really > haven't come across a better method of doing it then what you are > currently doing. You can check out this past thread that is > related...http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5027a7d... > > Brian > > On Feb 27, 5:15 am, Sir Rawlins <robert.rawl...@thinkbluemedia.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I posted this a moment ago but it seems to have disappeared off the > > list again for some reason? > > > I'm using FadeTo() on an <tr> element and it appears not to work in IE > > so I'm having to use tr.children().fadeTo() which absolutely kills > > performance in IE. I'll guess this is down to the way that IE handles > > opacity on its <tr> elements? is that correct? or is this a jQuery > > bug? > > > Any information on this would be really great!! > > > Rob
