I'm trying to guess here. I believe the problem is the padding of the element you are sliding. Try to remove the padding from li and add to the div inside.
I know jQuery animate padding as well but in the IE is not smooth enough. On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 19:52, Bill <bllfr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm seeing some weird behavior with the slideUp() and slideDown() > functions in IE 6, 7, and 8. > > First, open the following URL in Firefox, Chrome, or Safari: > > http://69.59.182.148:4080/test/07072009/html-scaffolding/advanced-search.html > > Click on one of the checkboxes under the first grouping with the > heading, "Multi-Select Filter Name 1." A control appears at left. If > you continue clicking on and off checkboxes, you will continue to add/ > subtract elements from the control appearing at left. Additionally you > can subtract elements from the control by clicking on the little "x" > icons. Whenever addition/subtraction occurs, jQuery first calls the > slideDown()/slideUp() function, and then deletes the actual HTML that > was just shown/hidden. This animation is very smooth in all browsers > that play according to the rules, but IE 6, 7, and 8 introduce some > "unique" detritus into the animation that makes it appear jumpy. > > 1. The solid blue border at left turns white during the animation > 2. A small white gap at the bottom of each added <li> element appears > during the animation > 3. The animation stops when it appears to be only half-way through, > meaning it doesn't change the height from 32px to 0px continuously. > Instead, it goes from 32 px to about 16px, and then straight to 0. > 4. #3 seems to be worse when the "x" icon is clicked rather than > unchecking the checkbox. > > I'm using jQuery v. 1.3.2. All my code is in the file > "jquery.smartfilter.js." > > I've read about issues like these in earlier versions of jQuery, but > applying fixes similar to the ones described in those articles bore no > fruit, which leads me to believe there's something wrong with my code. > Any insight into what's happening here would be greatly, greatly > appreciated. > > Regards, > > --Bill
