And then, the thread just died. What happened?
On Jul 28, 12:18 pm, ScottSEA <william.scott.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure. I have a thorough explanation, with sample xml, xsl, and js > files on Stack Overflow : > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1190763/firefox-not-running-jquery... > > On Jul 28, 12:10 pm, Eric Garside <gars...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can you give a sample of the output? How different is the result of > > the transform from valid xhtml? > > > On Jul 28, 2:55 pm, ScottSEA <william.scott.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 28, 9:55 am, ScottSEA <william.scott.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Until recently, I was humming along happily with my jQuery and HTML... > > > > life was good. Sadly, the Powers That Be have ordained that Thou > > > > Shalt Useth XHTML - so let it be done. > > > > > I've undergone the process to convert to XHTML - all is valid and all > > > > is well... but no. Firefox treats XHTML as XML. jQuery is designed > > > > for HTML - when appending / prepending / removing it uses the innerHTML > > > > () function, which of course doesn't work for XML/XHTML. > > > > > Lest you despair, there is indeed a question in here. Does anyone > > > > have a recommendation for using XHTML and jQuery? I'm not overly > > > > excited about writing my own plugin, so if someone has already done > > > > the heavy lifting, could you point me in the right direction? > > > > Serious omission on my part: > > > > These are all *local* .xml files that are transformed by stylesheets > > > to render xhtml. Ergo, no specifying of doctype, mimetype, no server, > > > nuttin'. Just local files - and the <xsl:output method='xml'> is the > > > problem. If I change it to HTML, then everything works fine - but > > > it's no longer XHTML. The three options are text, xml or html - xhtml > > > is not a valid choice.
