I'm not sure if this helps, but you can configure tablesorter on a per column basis
http://tablesorter.com/docs/example-options-headers.html On Aug 7, 12:38 pm, gord007 <josef....@gmail.com> wrote: > great answer :D > advise someone better? > > thx > > > > jQuery Lover-2 wrote: > > > You can write a javascript function that will add a row count column > > and after every table sort action will fire to clean the content of > > the column and repopulate it with numbers from 1 to 100. You can use > > tablesort's events: > > > $("table").bind("sortEnd",function() { > > // write your code here > > }); > > > ---- > > Read jQuery HowTo Resource - http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Rick Pasotto <r...@niof.net> wrote: > > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:02:01AM -0800, MorningZ wrote: > > >>> So to clarify, you always want that column to be sequentially 1 to n > >>> where n is the number of rows? > > >> Yes. > > >>> and if so, and the sort is descending, would it be n to 1 ? > > >> No. the first row should always rank #1. The user can reverse the sort > >> order if he wants to. The user wants to know the rank of some row near > >> the middle of the table without having to manually count the rows. > > >>> On Jan 17, 12:10 pm, Rick Pasotto <r...@niof.net> wrote: > >>> > I have a table in which the first column is the row number (always > >>> from > >>> > 1 at the top to 100 at the bottom) so no matter how the other columns > >>> > are sorted that first column should be the 'rank' for that particular > >>> > sort. > > >>> > Is it possible to do this with tablesorter? Could I change the values > >>> in > >>> > the first column after tablesorter did it's work? > > >>> > I see how to disable sorting on the first column but that is not what > >>> I > >>> > want. > > >>> > Could someone suggest another way to achieve what I want? > > >>> > -- > >>> > "Everything that you can imagine is real." -- Pablo Picasso > >>> > Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net http://www.niof.net > > >> -- > >> Our doctrine is based on private property. Communism is based on > >> systematic plunder, since it consists in handing over to one man, > >> without compensation, the labor of another. If it distributed to > >> each one according to his labor, it would, in fact, recognize > >> private property and would no longer be communism. > >> -- Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850) > >> Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net http://www.niof.net > > -- > View this message in > context:http://www.nabble.com/disable-column-from-sorting-in-tablesorter-tp21... > Sent from the jQuery General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
