"IMO, it doesn't belong in the core"

I think I read somewhere that a check for that usage will be in 1.3.3
core, but damned if I can find where I saw that stated




On Aug 25, 9:59 am, KeeganWatkins <mkeeganwatk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> it does not work in every browser. the purpose of jQuery and similar
> libraries is to streamline development and create a (mostly)
> consistent foundation to build on, regardless of browser. if you're
> interested in gaining some performance, or just using the latest JS
> features, i'd suggest implementing this yourself. IMO, it doesn't
> belong in the core, but it would be easy to add.
>
> something like this:
> if (Array.prototype.indexOf) {
>     $.inArray = function(elem, array) {
>         return array.indexOf(elem);
>
> }
>
> because $.inArray is already a part of the core, you'd just be
> replacing it where the native indexOf method exists on Arrays.
> otherwise, you'd just be using the standard implementation. hope that
> helps.
>
> On Aug 24, 12:28 pm, "Cesar Sanz" <the.email.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Does it works for every browser?
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "gurdiga" <gurd...@gmail.com>
> > To: "jQuery (English)" <jquery-en@googlegroups.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 1:07 PM
> > Subject: [jQuery] $.inArray optimisation
>
> > > Hello,
>
> > > The $.inArray function is defined in
> > >http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/jquery/src/core.js
> > > as:
>
> > > inArray: function( elem, array ) {
> > > for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ ) {
> > > if ( array[ i ] === elem ) {
> > > return i;
> > > }
> > > }
>
> > > return -1;
> > > },
>
> > > I'm wondering: would it be possible to take advantage of the built-in
> > > indexOf method of the Array present in FF Javascript engines? Im
> > > thinking of something like:
>
> > >    if (typeof Array.prototype.indexOf === 'function') {
> > >        return array.indexOf(elem);
> > >    }
>
> > > What do you think?

Reply via email to