2009/10/2 brian <bally.z...@gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 2009/10/2 brian <bally.z...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I like that idea but another might be to (after the form has >>> submitted) add a new submit handler for the form that simply returned >>> false. >> >> The problem with that is that the fields still can be changed. I >> prefer that this is not possible. A simple method would be to hide the >> form. But that is not very pleasing to the eyes I am afraid. >> > > I suppose it depends on the interface you're working with. Perhaps you > could fade the form out and display, in its place, a "thank you" (or > whatever) message. If "something goes wrong" you could re-display the > form.
That was what I am thinking about for lack of something better. I would prefer to hide it only after a succesfull submit. But I expect it to be mostly succesfull. So it is acceptable. -- Cecil Westerhof
