[ ... snipped ... ] > > ... and after looking at your code (which always helps), I see you're > referencing "this" (as opposed to jQuery's $(this)), which is why html() > wouldn't have worked. > > In that case, sure. It's been said that "this" is more efficient than > creating a jQuery reference to it via $(this). > > So to clarify... this.innerHTML is the functional equivalent of > $(this).html(), but without the "cost" of creating a new jQuery object for > each iteration of your each(). > [ ... snipped ... ]
Thanks for the explanation. I went back and cleaned up my code to use jQuery(this).html() instead of this.innerHTML and all is well. Mike
