UL LI LI will still work as CSS selector. The second LI is still a
descendant of the first one, regradless of it's parent and the css is
written that way. Šime Vidas wrote: You mean UL LI UL LI, instead of UL LI LI? Because you're not supposed to put LIs inside LIs... |
- [jQuery] Superfish IE6 dies with opacity ... cubefree
- [jQuery] Re: Superfish IE6 dies with... Šime Vidas
- Re: [jQuery] Re: Superfish IE6 d... Charlie
- [jQuery] Re: Superfish IE6 d... Šime Vidas
- Re: [jQuery] Re: Superfi... Jonathan Vanherpe (T & T NV)
- Re: [jQuery] Re: Superfi... Charlie
- [jQuery] Re: Superf... Šime Vidas