Thanks Joe! On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> There is no list called [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps you meant > either [EMAIL PROTECTED] (publicly archived) or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private)? > > --- On Fri, 7/25/08, Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Les Hazlewood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: JSecurity name "collisions" > > To: "JSecurity Developer List" <jsecurity-dev@incubator.apache.org> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Friday, July 25, 2008, 10:10 AM > > Um, I couldn't send mail to that email address (cc'd > > infrastructure to see > > if it is related to Apache email servers again). I got an > > immediate > > bounce-back: > > > > "This is an automatically generated Delivery Status > > Notification > > > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Technical details of permanent failure: > > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected > > by the recipient > > domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider > > for further > > information about the cause of this error. The error that > > the other server > > returned was: 550 550 mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted > > here (state > > 14)." > > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Les Hazlewood > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've CCd them to see what feedback they may have. > > How do we ensure that we > > > can use the name? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Les > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> it would be a good idea to run the question by > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Les Hazlewood wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yep, we've seen these before, but the good > > thing is that they're not > > >>> related > > >>> in form or function to our project so there > > shouldn't be any legal > > >>> conflict > > >>> at least (IANAL, but I think that's the > > case). Since the joomla product > > >>> has > > >>> been renamed, I don't think there's > > any issue there. Also the juniper > > >>> product is named slightly different to J - > > dash - Security, so they're > > >>> not > > >>> an exact overlap. This coupled with the > > different target of their focus > > >>> (totally different than ours), I think that > > makes things 'safe'. > > >>> > > >>> Plus in the last 3 or so years, I'm sure > > they've seen us (just do any > > >>> search > > >>> engine lookup for 'jsecurity' and > > we're always number one), but no one > > >>> has > > >>> ever contacted us about naming conflicts. > > I'm fairly sure they don't > > >>> care - > > >>> if they would have, they'd have said > > something by now... > > >>> > > >>> At least that's my take on it :) > > >>> > > >>> I wonder if should investigate purchasing a > > registered trademark just in > > >>> case... > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Alan D. > > Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> I searched on Google and found these > > companies using the JSecurity name: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > http://www.juniper.net/security/index.html?from=HomePage-Header-to-JSecurity > > >>>> > > http://joomlaequipment.com/content/view/1/4/ > > >>>> > > >>>> The latter looks like the JSecurity > > product got absorbed into a product > > >>>> called JDefender. We'll probably need > > to do a more thorough search. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Alan > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> -- > > >> cordialement, regards, > > >> Emmanuel Lécharny > > >> www.iktek.com > > >> directory.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
