On 23 December 2010 14:54, Yu-Hsuan Lai <rainco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I have totally understood your code, but is this the using > "new" which "Good Part" try to avoid? > "An even better coping strategy is to not use new at all." > In fact, I don't regard your classical implementation bad. This is the > reason why I'm so confused. > > If you want a more comprehensive discussion from Crockford on his various inheritance patterns, look at his videos listed here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11246/best-resources-to-learn-javascript/1531738#1531738 <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11246/best-resources-to-learn-javascript/1531738#1531738>They'll give you a much better idea of the ideas he discusses in the book. -- Nick Morgan http://skilldrick.co.uk @skilldrick <http://twitter.com/skilldrick>
-- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
