On Jan 2, 2:53 am, "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <t...@thenewobjective.com> wrote: > Yes I am well aware of the concept and do enjoy cute answers from time > to time, but it still does not answer the question. But at any rate I > believe this is a better article in regards to namespacing: <http:// > michaux.ca/articles/javascript-namespacing> > > On Jan 2, 1:18 am, jemptymethod <jemptymet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 1, 8:48 pm, "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <t...@thenewobjective.com> > > wrote: > > > > Unless private variables contain some type of uber-secret personally > > > damning info, why not just use this? > > > Consider familiarizing yourself with the module pattern, > > seehttp://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2007/06/12/module-pattern/publisha > > couple of months after I contracted for Yahoo!
I was not trying to be cute. Your example was prototype based, which the module pattern isn't. It seemed like apples and oranges to me. -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
