#1 - function(){ WScript.Echo("foo") }();
#2 - (function(){ WScript.Echo("foo") }());
#3 - (function(){ WScript.Echo("foo") })();
#1 is an error. #2 and #3 both work.
If I type "foo" or if I type ("foo") they are semantically the same
thing. same as if I type 1 vs (1), etc.
The fact that "function(){}()" and "( function(){}() )" are not
semantically the same seems a bit backwards logically.
Hence I prefer style #3
On Jan 15, 1:30 pm, Bill Heaton <pixelhand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am curious if anyone can give me insight why the nesting of the function to
> be immediately invoked should be completely contained within parenthesis ( //
> func () ); versus parenthesis + parenthesis ( // func )();
>
> I do not get why the parenthesis (and arguments if needed) would be better
> placed just inside the final closing parenthesis ')'
>
> Below is the typical pattern that I use, following the pattern of jQuery's
> source...
>
> (function($) {
> $.fn.pluginName = function(options) {
> var defaults = { elem : 'body' },
> opts = $.extend({}, defaults, options);
>
> return this.each(function() {
> // logic and return here
> });
> };
>
> })(this.jQuery);
>
> When testing the short template above with jslint.com I get this error...
>
> Error:
> Problem at line 10 character 3: Move the invocation into the parens that
> contain the function.
>
> })(this.jQuery);
>
> My options using jslint.com were : /*jslint onevar: true, browser: true */
>
> +-------------+
>
> I did review the "IIFE" article by Cowboy at
> :http://benalman.com/news/2010/11/immediately-invoked-function-express...and
> noticed that he writes ...
>
> (function(){ /* code */ })(); // I've been using this one
> (function(){ /* code */ }()); // Crockford recommends this one
>
> +-------------+
>
> It seems that this would be better in the opinion of Crockford's (jslint.com)
> syntax validation
>
> (function($) {
> $.fn.pluginName = function(options) {
> var defaults = { elem : 'body' },
> opts = $.extend({}, defaults, options);
>
> return this.each(function() {
> // logic and return here
> });
> };
>
> }(this.jQuery));
>
> +-------------+
>
> So, is the pattern for immediately invoked function better :
>
> (function( window ) {
> var self = window;
> return self.location.host;
>
> }( window ));
>
> In jQuery source I find this pattern
>
> (function( window ) {
> var self = window;
> return self.location.host;
>
> })( window );
>
> +-------------+
>
> On another topic, I just quit my day job to go back to full-time contracting
> and look forward to the opportunity to discuss Javascript here in this group.
>
> Thanks in advance for your thoughts on the topic of IIFE and placement of the
> parenthesis.
>
> Best regards,
>
> -Bill Heaton
> @pixelhandler
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
