2011/2/17 Rajat Mittal <lifeinafol...@gmail.com>: > That doesn't make much sense to me. I mean it sort of invalidates the onload > event. The fact that it has fired means that the image has loaded. So I > shouldn't be required to poll inside it again.
If every browser would work according to spec, there wont be a high need of frameworks that abstract event handling or AJAX. I think this is one similar case. -- Poetro -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@googlegroups.com/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jsmentors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
